CheckCrypto checkcrypto.cc 한국어
← To list

Chevron Corporation - Dinari CVX

arbitrum General token
Contract address 0x0e929101c4fa7c91eaa64d7216161ba3eee387fe
🗼 Watch 🔄 Re-inspect
C
42% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Caution
Assessed 2026-07-30 20:40 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 ⓘ
27% 6/22 checks
Observation coverage
Few indicators were checked. This means data is sparse, and the absence of risk signals does not guarantee safety. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

📊 Of the 25,165 tokens we have inspected, 31% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.

This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.

Contract safety

⚠ 1 signal · +25%p
Source code unverified (contract behavior cannot be checked)
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

⚠ 1 signal · +22%p
Supply concentrated in a few wallets
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — No observation data — cannot judge

We have not yet measured this token's sellability indicators. No data does not mean safe.

Check item by item →
🔗 Omnichain identity confirmed — the same token exists on 4 chains (risk is checked per chain)

These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →

Observation history (3 observations · 07/09 ~ 07/30 · source: our own observation snapshots)

Holders 14 → 14 +0.0%

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 42% (grade C). The main risk signals include Source code unverified, Supply concentrated in a few wallets. 1 positive signal was also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 42% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 42% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)

Collection & verification method →

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Source code unverified (contract behavior cannot be checked) +25

The source code is not published or verified, so there is no way to confirm what the contract actually does.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 64.8%) +22

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.

GOOD Ownership renounced — owner-only powers cannot be exercised

Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

🔄 Re-inspect 🗼 Watch this token 📣 Report on the board Method

This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria