CheckCrypto checkcrypto.cc 한국어
← To list

Staked USDz sUSDz

arbitrum LP/staking/lending derivative
Contract address 0x1b2c29e3897b8f9170c98440a483e90e715c879d
🗼 Watch 🔄 Re-inspect
B
18% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Low
Assessed 2026-07-14 15:59 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 · a fraud-pattern estimate, not a price/investment judgment ⓘ
82% 18/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

Contract safety

⚠ 2 signals · +6%p
Ownership not renounced — owner powers remain
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

⚠ 2 signals · +13%p
Supply concentrated in a few wallets
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 2 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →
🔗 Omnichain identity confirmed — the same token exists on 3 chains (risk is checked per chain)

These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →

This LP/staking/lending derivative has an estimated scam risk of about 18% (grade B). The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Creator wallet holds a high share of supply, Ownership not renounced. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 18% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 18% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)

Collection & verification method →

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit +3

The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.

MEDIUM Ownership not renounced — owner powers remain (0x0e5ec65ea055937646ab029ef3644de3de67766a) +4

Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 97.1%) +7

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

MEDIUM Creator wallet holds a high share of supply (97.1%) +6

The creator wallet holds a large amount, posing a dumping risk.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A sell simulation confirmed that selling works normally.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

🔄 Re-inspect 🗼 Watch this token 📣 Report on the board Method

This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria