SuperWalk GRND
0x3b58a4c865b568a2f6a957c264f6b50cba35d8ce📊 Of the 25,502 tokens we have inspected, 16% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
⚠ 1 signal · +25%pLiquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +17%pProject / dev
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
We have not yet measured this token's sellability indicators. No data does not mean safe.
Observation history (44 observations · 07/06 ~ 08/25 · source: our own observation snapshots)
⚠ Observed liquidity fell by 90%+ during this period. What that means is not yet confirmed — we have not verified here whether it is the same pool throughout (a pool migration looks the same) or a measurement gap. Treat it as a signal to check, not as a rug verdict.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 51% (grade C). The main risk signals include Source code unverified, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Liquidity (LP) not locked. 1 positive signal was also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 51% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 51% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The source code is not published or verified, so there is no way to confirm what the contract actually does.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Homepage
Categories: Gaming (GameFi), Play To Earn, Arbitrum Ecosystem, Move To Earn, Kaia Ecosystem
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria