⚠ Security incident history
- Hack A hack incident on a protocol linked to this token was reported on 2024-10-16.
Cross-checked against external security-incident records — factual information separate from the score. Being harmed by a hack can differ from wrongdoing by the project.
Contango TANGO
0xc760f9782f8cea5b06d862574464729537159966📊 Of the 19,689 tokens we have inspected, 11% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
⚠ 2 signals · +40%pLiquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +35%pHolder distribution
✓ No signalsProject / dev
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 1 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 59% (grade C). The main risk signals include Liquidity, Mintable, Ownership not renounced. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 59% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 59% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Homepage
Categories: Decentralized Finance (DeFi), Derivatives, Perpetuals, Arbitrum Ecosystem
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria