GLADIUS GLADIUS
0x34a1d2105dd1b658a48ead516a9ce3032082799cLiquidity / market
✓ No signalsHolder distribution
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances. The main risk signals include Blacklist function, Transfers can be paused, Transaction limit. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 19% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
⚖️ Co-observed fact: ownership is renounced, so if this function is owner-only there is no one left to execute it and it may be locked. However, if the function is tied to a non-owner address such as the creator or an admin, it may still be effective regardless of the renouncement, so the score is kept conservative.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
The transaction limit can be changed at will, even down to a sell limit of zero.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
⚖️ However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity info (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Liquidity $72,402 · 2 trading pairs (arenatrade) · View pool ↗
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria