Akita Inu AKITA
0xcaf5191fc480f43e4df80106c7695eca56e48b18Liquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +35%pHolder distribution
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
- avalanche this token · listing verified
-
ethereum
0x3301ee63…23e6· listing verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →
This Meme coin has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Liquidity, Mintable, Ownership not renounced. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 59% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
⚖️ This token is an identity-verified canonical, but the holder of this privilege (balance change) has not yet been confirmed to be a chain-standard bridge or a verified issuance structure, so it is kept as a hard risk. Registration and identity verification only prove 'this address is genuine' — they are not proof that this privilege is safely locked. Even if the project's own documents claim 'no admin privileges,' the risk is kept conservatively as long as it conflicts with on-chain measurements, and it is eased to an informational signal as soon as the privilege holder is confirmed to be a standard bridge or a verified structure.
There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A sell simulation confirmed that selling works normally.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria