← To list

Wife Changing Money WIFE

avalanche Meme coin
Contract address 0xe088d859d8bce513b76dc11c05d559254e28a336
F
88% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: Very high
Assessed 2026-07-14 13:48 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 · a fraud-pattern estimate, not a price/investment judgment
82% 18/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.
A single decisive fact fixes grade F: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances This one fact fixes the grade (risk 88% · F). No matter how good the other metrics are, they cannot reverse this verdict, because it is a reproducible hard gate. Why? Verified: goplus · 2026-07-14 13:48 KST
88%grade F

Contract safety

⛔ Decisive fact
Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — You can sell now, but sell-blocking mechanisms exist

Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.

Check item by item →

This Meme coin has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances. The main risk signals include Blacklist function. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 9% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)

Data sources: goplus · Collection & verification method →

🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)

FACT Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances — goplus

The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.

⚖️ Co-observed fact: ownership is renounced, so if this function is owner-only there is no one left to execute it and it may be locked. However, if the function is tied to a non-owner address such as the creator or an admin, it may still be effective regardless of the renouncement, so the score is kept conservative.

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Blacklist function — specific wallets can be blocked from trading (risk reduced by renounced ownership) +9 — goplus

A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

GOOD Ownership renounced — owner-only powers cannot be exercised

Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.

GOOD Not mintable — supply is fixed

No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.

⚖️ However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A sell simulation confirmed that selling works normally.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no GoPlus re-call). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria · Sources: goplus