← To list

Boson Token BOSON

base General token
Contract address 0x2192607c3cba9ec3d490206d10d831e68e5f3c97
F
88% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: Very high
Assessed 2026-08-07 07:11 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0
91% 20/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.

A single decisive fact fixes grade F: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances This one fact fixes the grade (risk 88% · F). No matter how good the other metrics are, they cannot reverse this verdict, because it is a reproducible hard gate. Why? Verified · 2026-08-07 07:11 KST
88%grade F

Contract safety

⛔ Decisive fact
Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

⚠ 1 signal · +35%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 1 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →
🔗 Omnichain identity confirmed — the same token exists on 5 chains (risk is checked per chain)

These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Liquidity, Mintable. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 53% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)

Collection & verification method →

🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)

FACT Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances

The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.

⚖️ This token is an identity-verified canonical, but the holder of this privilege (balance change) has not yet been confirmed to be a chain-standard bridge or a verified issuance structure, so it is kept as a hard risk. Registration and identity verification only prove 'this address is genuine' — they are not proof that this privilege is safely locked. Even if the project's own documents claim 'no admin privileges,' the risk is kept conservatively as long as it conflicts with on-chain measurements, and it is eased to an informational signal as soon as the privilege holder is confirmed to be a standard bridge or a verified structure.

FACT Hidden owner present

There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit +28

The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.

⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +35

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

GOOD Listed on a major tracking service

A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Project info (dev & social)

Categories: NFT, Metaverse, Polygon Ecosystem, Arbitrum Ecosystem, Ethereum Ecosystem

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria