izumi Token iZi
0x60d01ec2d5e98ac51c8b4cf84dfcce98d527c747
0x60d01e…27c747
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Identity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
-
arbitrum
0x60d01ec2…c747· listing verified - base this token · listing verified
-
bsc
0x60d01ec2…c747· listing verified -
ethereum
0x9ad37205…c200· listing verified -
polygon
0x60d01ec2…c747· listing verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. Verification method →
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 1 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day.
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | 88% |
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Mintable, Transfers can be paused, Supply concentrated in a few wallets. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 58% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
This token is an identity-verified canonical, but the holder of this privilege (balance change) has not yet been confirmed to be a chain-standard bridge or a verified issuance structure, so it is kept as a hard risk. Registration and identity verification only prove 'this address is genuine' — they are not proof that this privilege is safely locked. Even if the project's own documents claim 'no admin privileges,' the risk is kept conservatively as long as it conflicts with on-chain measurements, and it is eased to an informational signal as soon as the privilege holder is confirmed to be a standard bridge or a verified structure.
There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
Categories: Decentralized Exchange (DEX), Exchange-based Tokens, Decentralized Finance (DeFi), Automated Market Maker (AMM), BNB Chain Ecosystem
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria