← To list

This token has a confirmed scam record a recorded fact — not an estimate

A token that has already been rugged may show calm on-chain metrics now (a corpse looks clean), but the record governs the verdict.

100%confirmed · F

☠ Confirmed scam — basis

Verdict sourceOperator-verified confirmation (review-queue approval)
Confirmed on2026-07-02
CertaintyConfirmed — approved in review (cross-verified)
Basis notehuman-approved from review queue #207 (outcome_rug) (record kept verbatim in Korean)

If you dispute this record, let us know via Dispute.

Incident timeline

  • 2026-07-02 — confirmed record registered: human-approved from review queue #207 (outcome_rug)

This record is a statement of fact, not an investment instruction.

B20 Protocol B20Protocol

base General token ☠ Confirmed scam
Contract address 0x7b8e7087bc29dc53d502d3631a4e78d1266d993f
F
100% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: Very high
Assessed 2026-08-18 18:49 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0
91% 20/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.

A single decisive fact fixes grade F: Token on record as a confirmed scam This one fact fixes the grade (risk 100% · F). No matter how good the other metrics are, they cannot reverse this verdict, because it is a reproducible hard gate. Why? Verified · 2026-08-18 18:49 KST
100%grade F

Contract safety

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

⚠ 1 signal · +35%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

⚠ 2 signals · +49%p
Supply concentrated in a few wallets
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

⛔ Decisive fact
Token on record as a confirmed scam
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Observation history (60 observations · 07/25 ~ 08/18 · source: our own observation snapshots)

Holders 2.0K → 2.0K +0.1%

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 100% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Token on record as a confirmed scam. The main risk signals include Liquidity, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Creator wallet holds a high share of supply. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 100%
  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 64% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 100% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)

Collection & verification method →

🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)

FACT Token on record as a confirmed scam (Operator-verified confirmation (review-queue approval) · 2026-07-02)

This token is on record as a confirmed scam. The record is based on verified past facts (a rug pull, blocked sells, etc.); even if the current on-chain readings look calm (a token that has already been rugged reads clean), the risk verdict does not change. The basis for the verdict is disclosed below.

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +35

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 98.9%) +35

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

MEDIUM Creator wallet holds a high share of supply (98.9%) +14

The creator wallet holds a large amount, posing a dumping risk.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.

GOOD Not mintable — supply is fixed

No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria