This token has a confirmed scam record a recorded fact — not an estimate
A token that has already been rugged may show calm on-chain metrics now (a corpse looks clean), but the record governs the verdict.
LUNA LUNA
0x156ab3346823b651294766e23e6cf87254d68962This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
⚠ 1 signal · +12%pLiquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +35%pHolder distribution
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Observation history (60 observations · 08/01 ~ 08/18 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 100% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Token on record as a confirmed scam. The main risk signals include Liquidity, Upgradeable proxy. 2 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 100%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 43% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 100% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
This token is on record as a confirmed scam. The record is based on verified past facts (a rug pull, blocked sells, etc.); even if the current on-chain readings look calm (a token that has already been rugged reads clean), the risk verdict does not change. The basis for the verdict is disclosed below.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
This is an upgradeable proxy, so the contract logic can change after launch.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
⚖️ However, this is an upgradeable proxy: the owner can swap the implementation, so this fact can change at any time — it is an observation now, not a promise.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
⚖️ However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $65,208 (pancakeswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria