交易猫 交易猫
0x3906d09b5a81f2300398f40cf65278791e137f8e
0x3906d0…137f8e
Of the 44,172 tokens we have inspected, 5% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
4 signals · +72%pLiquidity / market
2 signals · +32%pHolder distribution
No signalsIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 1 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day.
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | 72% |
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 72% (grade D). The main risk signals include Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Trading pair created less than 3 days ago, Trading cooldown restriction present. 7 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 72% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 72% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
Co-observed fact: ownership is renounced and neither a hidden-owner nor an ownership-reclaim signal was observed, so we judge it likely that no one is left to execute this function and have lowered the risk tier. However, if the function is tied to a non-owner address such as the creator or an admin, it may still be effective regardless of the renouncement, so the signal itself is kept.
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
A forced wait between trades can constrain your sell timing.
The transaction limit can be changed at will, even down to a sell limit of zero.
The trading pair was created recently, so there is little history and a high risk of an early rug.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $23,841 (pancakeswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria