Kurumi Kurumi
0x44449eb99a54fb5f6de516ca4dc213602d50be33📊 Of the 23,301 tokens we have inspected, 60% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
✓ No signalsLiquidity / market
✓ No signalsProject / dev
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
Observation history (11 observations · 07/04 ~ 08/17 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 21% (grade B). The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets. 7 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 21% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 21% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Telegram 720 · Homepage
Categories: BNB Chain Ecosystem, Meme, Four.meme Ecosystem (BNB Memes)
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $37,184 (pancakeswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria