← To list

Swipe SXP

bsc General token
Contract address
0x47bead2563dcbf3bf2c9407fea4dc236faba485a 0x47bead…ba485a
D
63% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: High
Assessed 2026-10-02 19:00 KST · Rule-based score uncalibrated estimate · version 0.3.0 ⓘ
Observation coverage
100%22/22 checks
The share of indicators we could check — not a safety score
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

Of the 39,546 tokens we have inspected, 6% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.

This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction

Contract safety

2 signals · +34%p
Blacklist function — specific wallets can be blocked from trading
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

1 signal · +17%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

1 signal · +35%p
Supply concentrated in a few wallets
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Sellability — You can sell now, but sell-blocking mechanisms exist

Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.

Check item by item →

Observation history (60 observations · 09/03 ~ 10/02 · source: our own observation snapshots)

Liquidity $20.0K → $21.4K +7.1%
Holders 50.0K → 50.0K -0.1%

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 63% (grade D). The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Blacklist function, Liquidity (LP) not locked. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 63% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 63% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)

Collection & verification method →

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Blacklist function — specific wallets can be blocked from trading +22

A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.

MEDIUM Ownership not renounced — owner powers remain (0x1480725f7497f73253cb2e2c003f8b710e53470d) +12

Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.

In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +17

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 92.1%) +35

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

Positive signals (Green Flags)

These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.

GOOD Not mintable — supply is fixed

No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.

GOOD Listed on a major tracking service

A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Project info (dev & social)

Categories: BNB Chain Ecosystem, Harmony Ecosystem, Ethereum Ecosystem, Alameda Research Portfolio, YZi Labs (Prev. Binance Labs) Portfolio

Profile as of 2026-08-22 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)

Powered by CoinGecko

Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)

Total liquidity (all pairs) $31,513 11 trading pairs combined
Total 24h volume (all pairs) $280 11 trading pairs combined

Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $21,443 (pancakeswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗

Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading

This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria