This token has a confirmed scam record Evidence level: high · confirmed directly from transaction records
A token that has already been rugged may show calm on-chain metrics now (a corpse looks clean), but the record governs the verdict.
QRYPTA QRYP
0x5266fe1ad9b035d0ed6142f1a70e9d6f102c8153
0x5266fe…2c8153
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
4 signals · +82%pHolder distribution
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Observation history (60 observations · 10/01 ~ 10/21 · source: our own observation snapshots)
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 46 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day. After a fraud confirmation the score is shown fixed at 100%.
After confirmation
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-20 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-19 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-18 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-17 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-16 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-15 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-14 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-13 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-12 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-11 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-10 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-09 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-08 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-07 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-06 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-05 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-04 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-03 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-02 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-10-01 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-09-30 | 100% (after confirmation) |
| 2026-09-29 | 67% |
| 2026-09-28 | 67% |
| 2026-09-27 | 67% |
| 2026-09-26 | 67% |
| 2026-09-25 | 67% |
| 2026-09-24 | 67% |
| 2026-09-23 | 67% |
| 2026-09-22 | 67% |
| 2026-09-21 | 67% |
| 2026-09-20 | 67% |
| 2026-09-19 | 67% |
| 2026-09-18 | 67% |
| 2026-09-17 | 67% |
| 2026-09-16 | 75% |
| 2026-09-15 | 75% |
| 2026-09-14 | 75% |
| 2026-09-13 | 65% |
| 2026-09-12 | 60% |
| 2026-09-11 | 67% |
| 2026-09-10 | 67% |
| 2026-09-09 | 67% |
| 2026-09-08 | 65% |
| 2026-09-07 | 65% |
| 2026-09-06 | 65% |
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 100% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Token on record as a confirmed scam. The main risk signals include Mintable, Blacklist function, Transfers can be paused. 2 positive signals were also observed, but they do not override the confirmed-scam record. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 100%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 74% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 100% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
This token is on record as a confirmed scam. The record is based on verified past facts (a rug pull, blocked sells, etc.); even if the current on-chain readings look calm (a token that has already been rugged reads clean), the risk verdict does not change. The basis for the verdict is disclosed below.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria