Flying Tulip FT
0x5dd1a7a369e8273371d2dbf9d83356057088082c
0x5dd1a7…88082c
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Liquidity / market
1 signal · +17%pIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
-
avalanche
0x5dd1a7a3…082c· listing verified -
base
0x5dd1a7a3…082c· listing verified - bsc this token · on-chain verified
-
ethereum
0x5dd1a7a3…082c· on-chain verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. Verification method →
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 1 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day.
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-18 | 85% |
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 85% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Mintable, Transfers can be paused, Supply concentrated in a few wallets. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 85%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 65% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 85% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.
However, this liquidity is not locked — the deeper it is, the more the operator can pull out at once.
A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Whitepaper · Homepage
Categories: Decentralized Finance (DeFi), BNB Chain Ecosystem, Derivatives, Perpetuals, Avalanche Ecosystem
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $229,155 (pancakeswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria