BuiltByYou BuiltByYou
0x96028a4fc26834fbec517148aa6372eeb96f9997
0x96028a…6f9997
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Liquidity / market
1 signal · +17%pIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
The sell simulation failed, or the full balance was observed to be unsellable. If you buy it, you can't sell it.
Observation history (60 observations · 09/23 ~ 10/16 · source: our own observation snapshots)
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 52 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day.
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | 96% |
| 2026-10-15 | 96% |
| 2026-10-14 | 96% |
| 2026-10-13 | 96% |
| 2026-10-12 | 96% |
| 2026-10-11 | 96% |
| 2026-10-10 | 96% |
| 2026-10-09 | 96% |
| 2026-10-08 | 96% |
| 2026-10-07 | 96% |
| 2026-10-06 | 96% |
| 2026-10-05 | 96% |
| 2026-10-04 | 96% |
| 2026-10-03 | 96% |
| 2026-10-02 | 96% |
| 2026-10-01 | 96% |
| 2026-09-30 | 96% |
| 2026-09-29 | 96% |
| 2026-09-28 | 96% |
| 2026-09-27 | 96% |
| 2026-09-26 | 96% |
| 2026-09-25 | 96% |
| 2026-09-24 | 96% |
| 2026-09-23 | 96% |
| 2026-09-22 | 96% |
| 2026-09-21 | 96% |
| 2026-09-20 | 96% |
| 2026-09-19 | 96% |
| 2026-09-18 | 96% |
| 2026-09-17 | 96% |
| 2026-09-16 | 96% |
| 2026-09-15 | 96% |
| 2026-09-14 | 96% |
| 2026-09-13 | 96% |
| 2026-09-12 | 96% |
| 2026-09-11 | 96% |
| 2026-09-10 | 96% |
| 2026-09-09 | 96% |
| 2026-09-08 | 96% |
| 2026-09-07 | 96% |
| 2026-09-06 | 96% |
| 2026-09-05 | 96% |
| 2026-09-04 | 96% |
| 2026-09-03 | 96% |
| 2026-09-02 | 96% |
| 2026-09-01 | 96% |
| 2026-08-31 | 96% |
| 2026-08-30 | 96% |
| 2026-08-29 | 96% |
| 2026-08-28 | 96% |
| 2026-08-27 | 96% |
| 2026-08-26 | 96% |
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 96% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Honeypot: buys succeed but sells are blocked. The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Liquidity (LP) not locked, Blacklist function. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 96%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 43% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 96% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
Buys go through but sells are blocked, so your funds get trapped. A test-sell simulation confirmed the failure — the most blatant scam mechanic.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria