This token has a confirmed scam record a recorded fact — not an estimate
A token that has already been rugged may show calm on-chain metrics now (a corpse looks clean), but the record governs the verdict.
Flaze Coin FLAZE
0xf70c3d2077aa7ea2b2efb146bfb9b8fbd400af06
0xf70c3d…00af06
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
1 signal · +12%pHolder distribution
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Observation history (60 observations · 09/13 ~ 10/10 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 100% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Token on record as a confirmed scam. The main risk signals include Trading tax can be changed at will, Liquidity (LP) not locked, Ownership not renounced. 4 positive signals were also observed, but they do not override the confirmed-scam record. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 100%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 41% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 100% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
This token is on record as a confirmed scam. The record is based on verified past facts (a rug pull, blocked sells, etc.); even if the current on-chain readings look calm (a token that has already been rugged reads clean), the risk verdict does not change. The basis for the verdict is disclosed below.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria