Nova NOVA
0x0a71124aac7ed30c3d5347acdac50ef923369999
0x0a7112…369999
Of the 38,622 tokens we have inspected, 8% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
1 signal · +28%pLiquidity / market
2 signals · +36%pHolder distribution
No signalsIdentity / impersonation
1 signal · +12%pAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 58% (grade C). The main risk signals include Mintable, Trading pair created less than 3 days ago, Very low liquidity. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 58% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 58% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Liquidity is very low, so even a small sell swings the price sharply and exiting is difficult.
The trading pair was created recently, so there is little history and a high risk of an early rug.
A token with much deeper liquidity that we observed earlier uses the same symbol on this chain. This may be a clone imitating the popular token, so always cross-check the contract address. ("Observed earlier" means when we first saw it, not when it was issued; it could also be an unrelated project that merely shares the name.)
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $3,737 (uniswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria