BankSocial BSL
0x0af55d5ff28a3269d69b98680fd034f115dd53acThis assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Holder distribution
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
-
bsc
0x0af55d5f…53ac· listing verified - ethereum this token · listing verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →
Observation history (60 observations · 07/26 ~ 08/20 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances. The main risk signals include Blacklist function, Transfers can be paused, Trading tax can be changed at will. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 60% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
⚖️ This token is an identity-verified canonical, but the holder of this privilege (balance change) has not yet been confirmed to be a chain-standard bridge or a verified issuance structure, so it is kept as a hard risk. Registration and identity verification only prove 'this address is genuine' — they are not proof that this privilege is safely locked. Even if the project's own documents claim 'no admin privileges,' the risk is kept conservatively as long as it conflicts with on-chain measurements, and it is eased to an informational signal as soon as the privilege holder is confirmed to be a standard bridge or a verified structure.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
The transaction limit can be changed at will, even down to a sell limit of zero.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
⚖️ However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
⚖️ However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria