← To list

PANDO PANDO

ethereum General token
Contract address
0x252b9f56359901a0bde52d0675b1f1130d86f471 0x252b9f…86f471
F
85% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: Very high
Assessed 2026-10-03 04:48 KST · Rule-based score uncalibrated estimate · version 0.3.0 ⓘ
Observation coverage
100%22/22 checks
The share of indicators we could check — not a safety score
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction

A single decisive fact fixes grade F: Contract can self-destruct (selfdestruct) This one fact fixes the grade (risk 85% · F). No matter how good the other metrics are, they cannot reverse this verdict, because it is a reproducible hard gate. See why Verified · 2026-10-03 04:48 KST
85%grade F

Contract safety

Decisive fact
Contract can self-destruct (selfdestruct)
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

1 signal · +17%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Sellability — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →

Observation history (60 observations · 09/04 ~ 10/03 · source: our own observation snapshots)

Liquidity $159 → $113 -28.7%
Holders 15.8K → 15.7K -0.5%

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 85% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Contract can self-destruct. The main risk signals include Liquidity (LP) not locked, Ownership not renounced. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • A decisive risk factor forces at least 85%
  • Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 27% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 85% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)

Collection & verification method →

Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)

FACT Contract can self-destruct (selfdestruct)

The contract can be destroyed (selfdestruct), which could make the entire project disappear.

This finding is based on the fact that the authority is held — it is not an observation that the authority was used.

Risk signals (probability contribution)

MEDIUM Ownership not renounced — owner powers remain (0x34eabf0139796f3e4424ef5c833fe6342fc65b0b) +12

Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.

In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +17

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

Positive signals (Green Flags)

These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.

GOOD Not mintable — supply is fixed

No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

GOOD Listed on a major tracking service

A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Project info (dev & social)

Categories: Ethereum Ecosystem

Profile as of 2026-08-21 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)

Powered by CoinGecko

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading

This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria