Aavegotchi GHST Token GHST
0x3f382dbd960e3a9bbceae22651e88158d2791550
0x3f382d…791550
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Liquidity / market
1 signal · +17%pHolder distribution
No signalsIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
The sell simulation failed, or the full balance was observed to be unsellable. If you buy it, you can't sell it.
-
base
0xcd2f2223…9bcb· listing verified - ethereum this token · listing verified
-
polygon
0x385eeac5…54a7· listing verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. Verification method →
Observation history (60 observations · 09/05 ~ 10/04 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This LP/staking/lending derivative has an estimated scam risk of about 96% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Honeypot: buys succeed but sells are blocked, Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances. The main risk signals include Liquidity (LP) not locked, Transfers can be paused, Transaction limit (anti-whale) can be changed at will. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 96%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 35% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 96% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
Buys go through but sells are blocked, so your funds get trapped. A test-sell simulation confirmed the failure — the most blatant scam mechanic.
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
This token is an identity-verified canonical, but the holder of this privilege (balance change) has not yet been confirmed to be a chain-standard bridge or a verified issuance structure, so it is kept as a hard risk. Registration and identity verification only prove 'this address is genuine' — they are not proof that this privilege is safely locked. Even if the project's own documents claim 'no admin privileges,' the risk is kept conservatively as long as it conflicts with on-chain measurements, and it is eased to an informational signal as soon as the privilege holder is confirmed to be a standard bridge or a verified structure.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
The transaction limit can be changed at will, even down to a sell limit of zero.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub 0 · 0 commits/4wk · X · Telegram 3,342 · Homepage
Categories: Smart Contract Platform, Gaming (GameFi), NFT, Metaverse, Collectibles
Profile as of 2026-08-21 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria