← To list

ApeX Token APEX

ethereum General token
Contract address 0x52a8845df664d76c69d2eea607cd793565af42b8
C
42% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Caution
Assessed 2026-07-14 11:42 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 · a fraud-pattern estimate, not a price/investment judgment
100% 22/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

Contract safety

⚠ 1 signal · +11%p
Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

⚠ 1 signal · +35%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →
🔗 Omnichain identity confirmed — the same token exists on 2 chains (risk is checked per chain)
  • arbitrum 0x61a1ff55…3b56 · listed on CoinGecko
  • ethereum this token · listed on CoinGecko

These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 42% (grade C). The main risk signals include Liquidity, Mintable. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 42% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 42% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)

Data sources: goplus · dexscreener · Collection & verification method →

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit (risk reduced by renounced ownership) +11 — goplus

The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +35 — goplus

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

GOOD Ownership renounced — owner-only powers cannot be exercised

Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A sell simulation confirmed that selling works normally.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

GOOD Ample liquidity ($1,627,296)

Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no GoPlus re-call). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Liquidity info (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)

Liquidity $1,627,296 · 2 trading pairs (uniswap) · DexScreener ↗

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria · Sources: goplus, dexscreener