CheckCrypto checkcrypto.cc 한국어
← To list

Staked USDz sUSDz

ethereum LP/staking/lending derivative
Contract address 0x547213367cfb08ab418e7b54d7883b2c2aa27fd7
🗼 Watch 🔄 Re-inspect
F
85% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: Very high
Assessed 2026-07-14 19:16 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 · a fraud-pattern estimate, not a price/investment judgment ⓘ
82% 18/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.
A single decisive fact fixes grade F: Hidden owner present This one fact fixes the grade (risk 85% · F). No matter how good the other metrics are, they cannot reverse this verdict, because it is a reproducible hard gate. Why? Verified · 2026-07-14 19:16 KST
85%grade F

Contract safety

⛔ Decisive fact
Hidden owner present
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

⚠ 1 signal · +35%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

⚠ 1 signal · +7%p
Supply concentrated in a few wallets
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — You can sell now, but sell-blocking mechanisms exist

Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.

Check item by item →
🔗 Omnichain identity confirmed — the same token exists on 3 chains (risk is checked per chain)

These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →

This LP/staking/lending derivative has an estimated scam risk of about 85% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Liquidity, Blacklist function, Supply concentrated in a few wallets. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 85%
  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 53% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 85% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)

Collection & verification method →

🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)

FACT Hidden owner present

There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Blacklist function — specific wallets can be blocked from trading +22

A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +35

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 88.2%) +7

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

GOOD Not mintable — supply is fixed

No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A sell simulation confirmed that selling works normally.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

🔄 Re-inspect 🗼 Watch this token 📣 Report on the board Method

This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria