π»ααͺαGαͺOααͺπ» π»ααͺαGαͺOααͺπ»
0x5791254f5d7a4d7ce4dda0391ce15812b65ac2a2π Of the 29,609 tokens we have inspected, 81% score a higher risk than this coin. β This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns β not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
β 1 signal Β· +9%pLiquidity / market
β No signalsHolder distribution
β No signalsProject / dev
β No signalsIdentity / impersonation
β No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score β the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells β transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown β were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
Observation history (3 observations Β· 07/08 ~ 09/04 Β· source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 9% (grade A). The main risk signals include Blacklist function. 6 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- β Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 9% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 9% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% Β· the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
π’ Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals β appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run β cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety β it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional Β· about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token β only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found Β· X Β· Telegram Β· Homepage
Categories: Meme, Ethereum Ecosystem
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment Β· not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $16,435 (uniswap) Β· the totals combine every pair on this chain Β· View pool β
β Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference Β· not in the score)
Loadingβ¦
This estimate is as of the assessment time β a token's state can change at any moment Β· Method Β· Grade criteria