← To list

XREATORS ORT

ethereum General token
Contract address 0x5c59a5b139b0538cb106d775a022cad98dd14b5a
F
88% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: Very high
Assessed 2026-07-14 12:10 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 · a fraud-pattern estimate, not a price/investment judgment
95% 21/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.
A single decisive fact fixes grade F: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances This one fact fixes the grade (risk 88% · F). No matter how good the other metrics are, they cannot reverse this verdict, because it is a reproducible hard gate. Why? Verified: goplus · 2026-07-14 12:10 KST
88%grade F

Contract safety

⛔ Decisive fact
Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

⚠ 1 signal · +25%p
Supply concentrated in a few wallets
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Ownership not renounced. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 34% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)

Data sources: goplus · Collection & verification method →

🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)

FACT Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances — goplus

The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.

FACT Hidden owner present — goplus

There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.

Risk signals (probability contribution)

MEDIUM Ownership not renounced — owner powers remain (0x9744de355e38c8dc377d5de95d328f75b0375809) +12 — goplus

Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 68.5%) +25 — goplus

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

GOOD Not mintable — supply is fixed

No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.

⚖️ However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A sell simulation confirmed that selling works normally.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no GoPlus re-call). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria · Sources: goplus