⚠ Security incident history
-
Hack
A hack incident on a protocol linked to this token was reported on 2026-03-12.
· scale ~$862,000 (recovered ~$862,000)
Original external record: “Aave V3”
Cross-checked against external security-incident records — factual information separate from the score. Being harmed by a hack can differ from wrongdoing by the project.
Aave Token AAVE
0x7fc66500c84a76ad7e9c93437bfc5ac33e2ddae9📊 Of the 23,348 tokens we have inspected, 25% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
⚠ 1 signal · +12%pLiquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +35%pHolder distribution
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 4 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
-
arbitrum
0xba5ddd1f…7196· listing verified -
avalanche
0x63a72806…86d9· listing verified -
base
0x63706e40…814b· listing verified -
bsc
0xfb611544…f802· listing verified - ethereum this token · listing verified
-
optimism
0x76fb31fb…9278· listing verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →
Observation history (9 observations · 06/30 ~ 07/09 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This LP/staking/lending derivative has an estimated scam risk of about 43% (grade C). The main risk signals include Liquidity, Upgradeable proxy. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 43% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 43% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
This is an upgradeable proxy, so the contract logic can change after launch.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Liquidity $12,232,656 · 15 trading pairs (balancer) · View pool ↗
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria