Doge Pepe DOPE
0x86d43b2d1955757d8b882b46f964044d14fafb31
0x86d43b…fafb31
Of the 43,871 tokens we have inspected, 6% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
1 signal · +9%pLiquidity / market
2 signals · +32%pIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 1 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day.
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | 59% |
This Meme coin has an estimated scam risk of about 59% (grade C). The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Trading pair created less than 3 days ago, Blacklist function. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 59% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 59% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
The trading pair was created recently, so there is little history and a high risk of an early rug.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $7,799 (uniswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria