Security incident history
- Shutdown A shutdown incident on a protocol linked to this token was reported on 2024-11-29.
-
Hack
A hack incident on a protocol linked to this token was reported on 2022-11-03.
· scale ~$4,300,000
Original external record: “pNetwork”
Cross-checked against external security-incident records — factual information separate from the score. Being harmed by a hack can differ from wrongdoing by the project. External records as of 2026-10-02.
pNetwork Token PNT
0x89ab32156e46f46d02ade3fecbe5fc4243b9aaed
0x89ab32…b9aaed
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Liquidity / market
1 signal · +17%pHolder distribution
No signalsIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
Observation history (60 observations · 09/04 ~ 10/02 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Mintable, Transfers can be paused, Liquidity (LP) not locked. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 58% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub 0 · 0 commits/4wk · X · Telegram 2,985 · Homepage
Categories: Infrastructure, Decentralized Finance (DeFi), BNB Chain Ecosystem, Ethereum Ecosystem, Governance
Profile as of 2026-08-21 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $14,781 (uniswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria