AlphaKEK.AI AIKEK
0x8dce83eca4af45dbe618da1779f9aaca43201084📊 Of the 26,296 tokens we have inspected, 23% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
⚠ 2 signals · +32%pHolder distribution
✓ No signalsProject / dev
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
-
base
0x681a09a9…1f09· listing verified - ethereum this token · listing verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →
Observation history (8 observations · 07/05 ~ 08/27 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 44% (grade C). The main risk signals include Transfers can be paused, Trading tax can be changed at will, Ownership not renounced. 8 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 44% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 44% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
⚖️ However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.
A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Telegram 793 · Homepage
Categories: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Analytics, Solana Ecosystem, Ethereum Ecosystem, Telegram Apps
Profile as of 2026-08-10 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $102,124 (uniswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria