Wen Enable Trading WEN
0x9fd5360ccdeee5b5d3a46aa29f5a279e05e9b0bf
0x9fd536…e9b0bf
Of the 41,664 tokens we have inspected, 5% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
2 signals · +34%pLiquidity / market
1 signal · +17%pIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
Observation history (60 observations · 09/11 ~ 10/08 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 68% (grade D). The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Blacklist function, Liquidity (LP) not locked. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 68% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 68% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
The creator wallet holds a large amount, posing a dumping risk.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria