This token has a confirmed scam record a recorded fact — not an estimate
A token that has already been rugged may show calm on-chain metrics now (a corpse looks clean), but the record governs the verdict.
Wrapped UST Token UST
0xa47c8bf37f92abed4a126bda807a7b7498661acd
0xa47c8b…661acd
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
3 signals · +80%pLiquidity / market
1 signal · +17%pHolder distribution
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Observation history (60 observations · 09/03 ~ 10/02 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 100% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Token on record as a confirmed scam. The main risk signals include Deployer has a history of deploying many confirmed scam tokens, Same contract code as confirmed scams, Mintable. 4 positive signals were also observed, but they do not override the confirmed-scam record. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 100%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 82% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 100% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
This token is on record as a confirmed scam. The record is based on verified past facts (a rug pull, blocked sells, etc.); even if the current on-chain readings look calm (a token that has already been rugged reads clean), the risk verdict does not change. The basis for the verdict is disclosed below.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
The wallet that deployed this token has deployed many other tokens that were confirmed as scams — a serial-rugger pattern. (Only human-verified confirmed labels are counted, not our own score.)
This contract's deployed code is identical to already-confirmed scam tokens — the classic pattern of a rug factory cloning the same code.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub 0 · 0 commits/4wk · X · Homepage
Categories: USD Stablecoin, BNB Chain Ecosystem, Seigniorage, Wrapped-Tokens, Solana Ecosystem
Profile as of 2026-08-21 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $12,931 (sushiswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria