CheckCrypto checkcrypto.cc 한국어
← To list

Alchemix USD alUSD

ethereum LP/staking/lending derivative
Contract address 0xbc6da0fe9ad5f3b0d58160288917aa56653660e9
🗼 Watch 🔄 Re-inspect
F
85% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: Very high
Assessed 2026-08-23 21:20 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 ⓘ
95% 21/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.

A single decisive fact fixes grade F: Hidden owner present This one fact fixes the grade (risk 85% · F). No matter how good the other metrics are, they cannot reverse this verdict, because it is a reproducible hard gate. Why? Verified · 2026-08-23 21:20 KST
85%grade F

Contract safety

⛔ Decisive fact
Hidden owner present
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

⚠ 1 signal · +35%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — You can sell now, but sell-blocking mechanisms exist

Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.

Check item by item →
🔗 Omnichain identity confirmed — the same token exists on 3 chains (risk is checked per chain)

These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →

This LP/staking/lending derivative has an estimated scam risk of about 85% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Liquidity (LP) not locked, Blacklist function, Mintable. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 85%
  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 51% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 85% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)

Collection & verification method →

🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)

FACT Hidden owner present

There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit +3

The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.

⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.

HIGH Blacklist function — specific wallets can be blocked from trading +22

A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +35

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.

GOOD Ample liquidity ($2,204,352)

Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.

⚖️ However, this liquidity is not locked — the deeper it is, the more the operator can pull out at once.

GOOD Listed on a major tracking service

A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Project info (dev & social)

🛠 GitHub ★0 · 0 commits/4wk · X · Homepage

Categories: Stablecoins, USD Stablecoin, Fantom Ecosystem, Arbitrum Ecosystem, Ethereum Ecosystem

Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)

Total liquidity (all pairs) $3,601,360 10 trading pairs combined
Total 24h volume (all pairs) $73,009 10 trading pairs combined

Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $2,204,352 (curve) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗

⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

🔄 Re-inspect 🗼 Watch this token 📣 Report on the board Method

This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria