Hard Floor Assets HFA
0xd0a606adf58b69a28d479aa510ce6fe96e0a1eb2This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Liquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +6%pIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 2 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances. The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Creator wallet holds a high share of supply, Mintable. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 53% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
⚖️ Co-observed fact: ownership is renounced, so if this function is owner-only there is no one left to execute it and it may be locked. However, if the function is tied to a non-owner address such as the creator or an admin, it may still be effective regardless of the renouncement, so the score is kept conservative.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
The creator wallet holds a large amount, posing a dumping risk.
The trading pair was created recently, so there is little history and a high risk of an early rug.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $8,570 (uniswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria