Ampleforth AMPL
0xd46ba6d942050d489dbd938a2c909a5d5039a161📊 Of the 23,317 tokens we have inspected, 7% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
✓ No signalsLiquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +35%pProject / dev
⚠ 1 signal · +14%pIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 4 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
-
avalanche
0x027dbca0…3aa7· listing verified -
bsc
0xdb021b1b…f07f· listing verified - ethereum this token · listing verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →
Observation history (22 observations · 07/03 ~ 08/18 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 64% (grade D). The main risk signals include Liquidity, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Development stalled. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 64% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 64% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
A public repository exists but has had no code changes in the last 4 weeks — it may be abandoned or development may have stopped.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.
⚖️ However, this liquidity is not locked — the deeper it is, the more the operator can pull out at once.
A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
🛠 GitHub ★279 · 0 commits/4wk · X · Telegram 5,238 · Whitepaper · Homepage
Categories: Decentralized Finance (DeFi), Rebase Tokens, BNB Chain Ecosystem, Avalanche Ecosystem, Near Protocol Ecosystem
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $513,583 (uniswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria