← To list

⚠ Security incident history

Cross-checked against external security-incident records — factual information separate from the score. Being harmed by a hack can differ from wrongdoing by the project.

Curve DAO Token CRV

ethereum General token
Contract address 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52
C
60% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Caution
Assessed 2026-08-06 04:39 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0
95% 21/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

📊 Of the 19,771 tokens we have inspected, 10% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.

This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.

Contract safety

⚠ 1 signal · +28%p
Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

⚠ 1 signal · +35%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

⚠ 1 signal · +14%p
Development stalled — no commits in the last 4 weeks
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →
🔗 Omnichain identity confirmed — the same token exists on 5 chains (risk is checked per chain)

These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 60% (grade C). The main risk signals include Liquidity, Mintable, Development stalled. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 60% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 60% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)

Collection & verification method →

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit +28

The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.

⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +35

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

MEDIUM Development stalled — no commits in the last 4 weeks (★1109 · 0 commits in the last 4 weeks) +14

A public repository exists but has had no code changes in the last 4 weeks — it may be abandoned or development may have stopped.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

GOOD Ample liquidity ($1,435,780)

Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.

⚖️ However, this liquidity is not locked — the deeper it is, the more the operator can pull out at once.

GOOD Listed on a major tracking service

A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Project info (dev & social)

Categories: Decentralized Exchange (DEX), Exchange-based Tokens, Decentralized Finance (DeFi), Yield Farming, Automated Market Maker (AMM)

Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)

Total liquidity $5,289,934 18 trading pairs combined
Total 24h volume $308,217 18 trading pairs combined

Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $1,435,780 (curve) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗

⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria