PILLAR PLR
0xe3818504c1b32bf1557b16c238b2e01fd3149c17This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Liquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +35%pHolder distribution
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
The sell simulation failed, or the full balance was observed to be unsellable. If you buy it, you can't sell it.
Observation history (60 observations · 07/25 ~ 08/18 · source: our own observation snapshots)
- 허니팟 전환 — 이전 검사에서는 매도 가능 → 현재 매도 차단/전량매도불가 탐지 · 08/03
The risk transitions above were detected in the observation history — register on the Watchtower to get instant push notifications of such changes.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 96% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Honeypot: buys succeed but sells are blocked, Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances. The main risk signals include Liquidity, Mintable, Ownership not renounced. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 96%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 59% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 96% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
Buys go through but sells are blocked, so your funds get trapped. A test-sell simulation confirmed the failure — the most blatant scam mechanic.
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
⚖️ However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $13,075 (sushiswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria