Shipy McShipface Shipy
0xe3a8013c467c6c9dce1deb26a0f6d10929bffd86Identity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 85% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Very low liquidity, Blacklist function. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 85%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 55% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 85% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
Liquidity is very low, so even a small sell swings the price sharply and exiting is difficult.
The trading pair was created recently, so there is little history and a high risk of an early rug.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
⚖️ However, a hidden-owner signal was also observed, so the renouncement may be only nominal.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity info (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Liquidity $4,890 · 1 trading pairs (uniswap) · View pool ↗
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria