apeonfone fone
0xf042d0d4547d6282da2301c9ffff972af96f81b5This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Holder distribution
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
The sell simulation failed, or the full balance was observed to be unsellable. If you buy it, you can't sell it.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 96% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Honeypot: buys succeed but sells are blocked, Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances. The main risk signals include Transfers can be paused, Trading tax can be changed at will, Ownership not renounced. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 96%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 54% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 96% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
Buys go through but sells are blocked, so your funds get trapped. A test-sell simulation confirmed the failure — the most blatant scam mechanic.
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
A forced wait between trades can constrain your sell timing.
The transaction limit can be changed at will, even down to a sell limit of zero.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
⚖️ However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
⚖️ However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria