America250 AMERICA250
0xf515a333ad3ad620354cd10e9102f2ec278be589This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Identity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
The sell simulation failed, or the full balance was observed to be unsellable. If you buy it, you can't sell it.
Observation history (14 observations · 07/03 ~ 09/13 · source: our own observation snapshots)
⚠ Observed liquidity fell by 90%+ during this period. What that means is not yet confirmed — we have not verified here whether it is the same pool throughout (a pool migration looks the same) or a measurement gap. Treat it as a signal to check, not as a rug verdict.
- 유동성 급감 — $487,583 → $192,894 (−60%) · 07/05
- 유동성 급감 — $192,894 → $25,686 (−87%) · 07/06
- 유동성 급감 — $26,268 → $6 (−100%) · 07/08
- 허니팟 전환 — 이전 검사에서는 매도 가능 → 현재 매도 차단/전량매도불가 탐지 · 09/13
- 소유권/권한 변경 — 소유자의 잔액 변경 권한이 활성화됨 · 09/13
The risk transitions above were detected in the observation history — register on the Watchtower to get instant push notifications of such changes.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 96% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Honeypot: buys succeed but sells are blocked. The main risk signals include Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Trading cooldown restriction present. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 96%
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 76% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 96% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
Buys go through but sells are blocked, so your funds get trapped. A test-sell simulation confirmed the failure — the most blatant scam mechanic.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
⚖️ Co-observed fact: ownership is renounced and neither a hidden-owner nor an ownership-reclaim signal was observed, so we judge it likely that no one is left to execute this function and have lowered the risk tier. However, if the function is tied to a non-owner address such as the creator or an admin, it may still be effective regardless of the renouncement, so the signal itself is kept.
Transfers can be paused, letting the operator freeze trading.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
A forced wait between trades can constrain your sell timing.
The transaction limit can be changed at will, even down to a sell limit of zero.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
⚖️ However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria