StonkTower STONKTOWER
0xff954252dd5d782afd2a69fb0325c2c1077c5044📊 Of the 34,470 tokens we have inspected, 5% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
⚠ 1 signal · +50%pLiquidity / market
⚠ 1 signal · +24%pIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 75% (grade D). The main risk signals include Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Trading pair created less than 3 days ago. 5 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 75% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 75% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
⚖️ Co-observed fact: ownership is renounced and neither a hidden-owner nor an ownership-reclaim signal was observed, so we judge it likely that no one is left to execute this function and have lowered the risk tier. However, if the function is tied to a non-owner address such as the creator or an admin, it may still be effective regardless of the renouncement, so the signal itself is kept.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
The trading pair was created recently, so there is little history and a high risk of an early rug.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
⚖️ However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria