CheckCrypto checkcrypto.cc 한국어
← To list

Axelar AXL

optimism General token
Contract address 0x23ee2343b892b1bb63503a4fabc840e0e2c6810f
🗼 Watch 🔄 Re-inspect
F
88% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: Very high
Assessed 2026-07-18 17:49 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 · a fraud-pattern estimate, not a price/investment judgment ⓘ
82% 18/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.
A single decisive fact fixes grade F: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances This one fact fixes the grade (risk 88% · F). No matter how good the other metrics are, they cannot reverse this verdict, because it is a reproducible hard gate. Why? Verified · 2026-07-18 17:49 KST
88%grade F

Contract safety

⛔ Decisive fact
Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

⚠ 1 signal · +18%p
Supply concentrated in a few wallets
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 2 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →
🔗 Omnichain identity confirmed — the same token exists on 7 chains (risk is checked per chain)

These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances. The main risk signals include Mintable, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Ownership not renounced. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • 🔴 A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 48% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)

Collection & verification method →

🔴 Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)

FACT Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances

The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.

⚖️ This token is an identity-verified canonical, but the holder of this privilege (balance change) has not yet been confirmed to be a chain-standard bridge or a verified issuance structure, so it is kept as a hard risk. Registration and identity verification only prove 'this address is genuine' — they are not proof that this privilege is safely locked. Even if the project's own documents claim 'no admin privileges,' the risk is kept conservatively as long as it conflicts with on-chain measurements, and it is eased to an informational signal as soon as the privilege holder is confirmed to be a standard bridge or a verified structure.

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit +28

The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.

MEDIUM Ownership not renounced — owner powers remain (0xe432150cce91c13a887f7d836923d5597add8e31) +12

Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 58.3%) +18

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

🔄 Re-inspect 🗼 Watch this token 📣 Report on the board Method

This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria