Aimedis AIMX
0x33b6d77c607ea499ab5db7e2201c5a516a78a5db
0x33b6d7…78a5db
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Holder distribution
No signalsIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Mechanisms an owner could use to block sells — transfer pause, blacklist, cooldown — were found. It can turn into a honeypot at any time.
Observation history (60 observations · 09/01 ~ 09/29 · source: our own observation snapshots)
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 88% (grade F). Decisive risk factors were found: Owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, Hidden owner present. The main risk signals include Blacklist function, Trading tax can be changed at will, Trading cooldown restriction present. 6 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- A decisive risk factor forces at least 88%
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 49% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 88% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Decisive facts (reproducible, near-certain)
The owner can arbitrarily change wallet balances, effectively zeroing out holders' tokens.
There is an owner that is not openly visible, so real control may be hidden even when ownership looks renounced.
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A blacklist function can block specific wallets from trading, so sells can be blocked at will.
The trading tax can be changed later, enabling a trap that spikes the tax after launch.
A forced wait between trades can constrain your sell timing.
The transaction limit can be changed at will, even down to a sell limit of zero.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
However, a hidden-owner signal was also observed, so the renouncement may be only nominal.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
However, a balance-change privilege exists, so holdings could be manipulated even without additional minting.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
The liquidity is locked, so the risk of the operator pulling liquidity in a rug is low.
A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub 0 · 0 commits/4wk · X · Telegram 1,606 · Whitepaper · Homepage
Categories: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Healthcare, NFT, Metaverse, Polygon Ecosystem
Profile as of 2026-08-14 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $25,884 (quickswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria