Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH (FXERC20) fxcbETH
0x4b4327db1600b8b1440163f667e199cef35385f5📊 Of the 19,737 tokens we have inspected, 26% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
⚠ 1 signal · +4%pLiquidity / market
⚠ 2 signals · +47%pHolder distribution
✓ No signalsProject / dev
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 4 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
-
arbitrum
0x1debd73e…732f· listing verified -
base
0x2ae3f1ec…ec22· listing verified -
ethereum
0xbe989514…9704· listing verified -
optimism
0xaddb6a04…f3b2· listing verified - polygon this token · listing verified
These are per-chain instances of the same omnichain token. Thin liquidity on one chain does not by itself mean fraud, and the identity is confirmed on-chain / by listing. How do we verify? →
This Wrapped/bridged token has an estimated scam risk of about 45% (grade C). The main risk signals include Liquidity, Very low liquidity, Ownership not renounced. 2 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 45% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 45% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
Liquidity is very low, so even a small sell swings the price sharply and exiting is difficult.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.
A profile for this token exists on major data services such as CoinGecko. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Whitepaper · Homepage
Categories: Crypto-Backed Tokens, Wrapped-Tokens, Polygon Ecosystem, Arbitrum Ecosystem, Liquid Staking Tokens
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $41 (uniswap) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
⚠ Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria