← To list

ZEN Exchange Token pZCX

polygon General token
Contract address 0xdd75542611d57c4b6e68168b14c3591c539022ed
D
76% Estimated scam risk (uncalibrated)
Risk: High
Assessed 2026-07-14 12:19 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 · a fraud-pattern estimate, not a price/investment judgment
100% 22/22 checks
Observation coverage
We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

Contract safety

⚠ 2 signals · +40%p
Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit
Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

⚠ 2 signals · +47%p
Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible
Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

⚠ 1 signal · +35%p
Supply concentrated in a few wallets
Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data
Counted as neither risky nor safe
Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

✓ No signals
No risk signals fired among the checked indicators
Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. Upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →

Observation history (3 observations · 06/30 ~ 07/14 · source: our own observation snapshots)

Holders 31.9K → 31.9K +0.0%

This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 76% (grade D). The main risk signals include Liquidity, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Mintable. 3 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

  • ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 76% (overlapping signals add less and less)
  • = Final 76% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)

Data sources: goplus · dexscreener · Collection & verification method →

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Mintable — supply can be diluted without limit +28 — goplus

The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.

MEDIUM Ownership not renounced — owner powers remain (0xceadc4fdb2298e183f9192b943d7e8ba8e0dba48) +12 — goplus

Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +35 — goplus

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 84.3%) +35 — goplus

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

MEDIUM Very low liquidity ($497) +12 — goplus

Liquidity is very low, so even a small sell swings the price sharply and exiting is difficult.

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

GOOD Source code verified and published

The contract source is public and verified, so anyone can check its behavior.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A sell simulation confirmed that selling works normally.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no GoPlus re-call). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Liquidity info (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)

Liquidity $497 · 1 trading pairs (quickswap) · DexScreener ↗

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria · Sources: goplus, dexscreener