PEPE(PEPE) scam risk 51% · grade C

PEPE PEPE

solana Meme coin

Contract address 2Zaq3WyDJj2ZkMcuqUiTBfAXCjqZtqihxcwUdwv9dyHA

Caution

Assessed 2026-07-14 09:50 KST · heuristic uncalibrated estimate · heuristic-0.2.0 · a fraud-pattern estimate, not a price/investment judgment ⓘ

Observation coverage

We checked a broad set of core on-chain indicators. Unchecked indicators are neither risky nor safe.

Contract safety

✓ No signals

No risk signals fired among the checked indicators

Go to evidence below ↓

Liquidity / market

⚠ 1 signal · +35%p

Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible

Go to evidence below ↓

Holder distribution

⚠ 1 signal · +14%p

Supply concentrated in a few wallets

Go to evidence below ↓

Project / dev

— Insufficient data

Counted as neither risky nor safe

Go to evidence below ↓

Identity / impersonation

⚠ 1 signal · +12%p

Suspected lookalike — an older, larger token with the same symbol exists

Go to evidence below ↓

Axis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).

Can you sell? — Sellable as currently observed — but this is not a safety guarantee

This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 3 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.

Check item by item →

This Meme coin has an estimated scam risk of about 51% (grade C). The main risk signals include Liquidity, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Suspected lookalike. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.

How this score was produced

⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 51% (overlapping signals add less and less)
= Final 51% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are human-set, so this is an uncalibrated estimate)

Data sources: goplus · Collection & verification method →

Risk signals (probability contribution)

HIGH Liquidity (LP) not locked — rug pull possible (Locked 0.0%) +35 — goplus

The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.

HIGH Supply concentrated in a few wallets (Max single holding 53.2%) +14 — goplus

A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.

MEDIUM Suspected lookalike — an older, larger token with the same symbol exists ('PEPE' older same-name token exists — liquidity $152,983 (not comparable (own liquidity unmeasured)), first observed 7 days earlier) +12 — flywheel

An older token with much deeper liquidity uses the same symbol on this chain. This may be a clone imitating the popular token, so always cross-check the contract address. (It could also be an unrelated project that merely shares the name.)

🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)

GOOD Ownership renounced — owner-only powers cannot be exercised

Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.

GOOD Not mintable — supply is fixed

No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.

GOOD Sells work normally (not a honeypot)

A sell simulation confirmed that selling works normally.

GOOD No blacklist function

There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.

Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)

The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no GoPlus re-call). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.

Community rating (for reference · not in the score)

Loading…

🔄 Re-inspect 🗼 Watch this token 📣 Report on the board Method

This estimate is as-of the assessment time and uncalibrated, and is not investment advice · Method · Grade criteria · Sources: goplus