Yeezy Coin YzY
4NBTf8PfLH4oLFnwf3knv46FY9i5oXjDxffCetXRpump
4NBTf8Pf…XRpump
Of the 44,291 tokens we have inspected, 57% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
No signalsLiquidity / market
1 signal · +17%pHolder distribution
No signalsIdentity / impersonation
1 signal · +12%pAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 2 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
Observation history (60 observations · 09/03 ~ 10/17 · source: our own observation snapshots)
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 64 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day.
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-17 | 27% |
| 2026-10-16 | 27% |
| 2026-10-15 | 27% |
| 2026-10-14 | 27% |
| 2026-10-11 | 27% |
| 2026-10-09 | 27% |
| 2026-10-06 | 27% |
| 2026-10-05 | 27% |
| 2026-10-04 | 27% |
| 2026-09-30 | 27% |
| 2026-09-29 | 27% |
| 2026-09-28 | 27% |
| 2026-09-27 | 27% |
| 2026-09-26 | 27% |
| 2026-09-22 | 27% |
| 2026-09-20 | 27% |
| 2026-09-18 | 27% |
| 2026-09-17 | 27% |
| 2026-09-15 | 27% |
| 2026-09-11 | 27% |
| 2026-09-08 | 27% |
| 2026-09-04 | 27% |
| 2026-09-03 | 27% |
| 2026-08-31 | 27% |
| 2026-08-30 | 27% |
| 2026-08-29 | 27% |
| 2026-08-28 | 27% |
| 2026-08-25 | 17% |
| 2026-08-24 | 27% |
| 2026-08-22 | 43% |
| 2026-08-21 | 43% |
| 2026-08-20 | 43% |
| 2026-08-19 | 43% |
| 2026-08-18 | 43% |
| 2026-08-17 | 43% |
| 2026-08-16 | 43% |
| 2026-08-15 | 43% |
| 2026-08-14 | 43% |
| 2026-08-13 | 43% |
| 2026-08-12 | 43% |
| 2026-08-11 | 43% |
| 2026-08-10 | 43% |
| 2026-08-09 | 43% |
| 2026-08-08 | 43% |
| 2026-08-07 | 43% |
| 2026-08-06 | 43% |
| 2026-08-05 | 43% |
| 2026-08-04 | 43% |
| 2026-08-03 | 43% |
| 2026-08-02 | 43% |
| 2026-08-01 | 43% |
| 2026-07-31 | 43% |
| 2026-07-30 | 43% |
| 2026-07-29 | 43% |
| 2026-07-28 | 43% |
| 2026-07-27 | 43% |
| 2026-07-26 | 43% |
| 2026-07-25 | 43% |
| 2026-07-24 | 43% |
| 2026-07-23 | 43% |
| 2026-07-22 | 43% |
| 2026-07-21 | 43% |
| 2026-07-20 | 43% |
| 2026-07-19 | 43% |
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 27% (grade B). The main risk signals include Liquidity (LP) not locked, Suspected lookalike. 6 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 27% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 27% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
A token with much deeper liquidity that we observed earlier uses the same symbol on this chain. This may be a clone imitating the popular token, so always cross-check the contract address. ("Observed earlier" means when we first saw it, not when it was issued; it could also be an unrelated project that merely shares the name.)
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.
However, this liquidity is not locked — the deeper it is, the more the operator can pull out at once.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $361,199 (raydium) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria