This token has a confirmed scam record a recorded fact — not an estimate
A token that has already been rugged may show calm on-chain metrics now (a corpse looks clean), but the record governs the verdict.
Bullius Maximus Bullius
6YZm2PVLBozyfvGrMTrZbZHxYQz8aFG3sm6rCfw3pumpThis assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
Observation history (11 observations · 07/07 ~ 07/13 · source: our own observation snapshots)
⚠ Observed liquidity fell by 90%+ during this period. What that means is not yet confirmed — we have not verified here whether it is the same pool throughout (a pool migration looks the same) or a measurement gap. Treat it as a signal to check, not as a rug verdict.
- 유동성 급감 — $49,323 → $3,799 (−92%) · 07/07
The risk transitions above were detected in the observation history — register on the Watchtower to get instant push notifications of such changes.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 100% (grade F). The main risk signals include Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Very low liquidity. 4 positive signals were also observed, but they do not override the confirmed-scam record. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 43% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 100% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
Liquidity is very low, so even a small sell swings the price sharply and exiting is difficult.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
Ownership was transferred to a burn address, so no one can call owner-only functions such as minting or pausing.
No additional tokens can be minted, so there is no supply-dilution risk.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main-pair (deepest pool) liquidity $3,478 · 1 trading pairs on this chain (pumpswap) · View pool ↗
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria