Curetopia Token CURES
9qU3LmwKJKT2DJeGPihyTP2jc6pC7ij3hPFeyJVzuksN📊 Of the 19,333 tokens we have inspected, 24% carry a higher risk than this coin — i.e. this coin sits in the safer 76%. Lower is safer.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment.
Contract safety
⚠ 2 signals · +40%pLiquidity / market
✓ No signalsProject / dev
✓ No signalsIdentity / impersonation
✓ No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 3 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
This General token has an estimated scam risk of about 49% (grade C). The main risk signals include Mintable, Supply concentrated in a few wallets, Ownership not renounced. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- ⚠ Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 49% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 49% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · the weights are human-set)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
⚖️ In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
A few wallets monopolize the supply, so a single sell-off could collapse the price.
🟢 Positive signals (Green Flags)
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
Liquidity is deep, so the risk of price shock or difficulty exiting is low.
Listed on major data services such as CoinGecko, so it has passed a minimum of exposure and vetting.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Telegram 750 · Homepage
Categories: Solana Ecosystem, Decentralized Science (DeSci)
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment)
Liquidity $102,796 · 2 trading pairs (meteora) · View pool ↗
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
Loading…
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria