SHIBA INU (Wormhole) SHIB
CiKu4eHsVrc1eueVQeHn7qhXTcVu95gSQmBpX4utjL9z
CiKu4eHs…utjL9z
Of the 43,902 tokens we have inspected, 10% score a higher risk than this coin. — This is a relative position within the sample we inspected, which was built by deliberately hunting scams and rugs, so it is not a general market distribution. A ranking is not a statement of safety.
This assessment is an uncalibrated estimate of fraud patterns — not a price or investment judgment. Request a correction
Contract safety
2 signals · +40%pLiquidity / market
2 signals · +29%pHolder distribution
No signalsIdentity / impersonation
No signalsAxis cards show where signals are, not a per-axis score — the %p contribution is a simple sum, while the actual combine uses diminishing returns (overlaps add less).
This only means no sell-block signals were observed at inspection time. 2 indicator(s) remain unverified, and upgrades or owner actions can change the state at any time.
Observation history (60 observations · 08/02 ~ 10/16 · source: our own observation snapshots)
Score history (days with a score in the last 90 days: 45 · dates in KST)
The last public score computed each day.
Values by date
| Date (KST) | Public score |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | 54% |
| 2026-10-02 | 54% |
| 2026-09-27 | 54% |
| 2026-09-25 | 54% |
| 2026-09-10 | 54% |
| 2026-09-06 | 54% |
| 2026-09-04 | 54% |
| 2026-08-24 | 54% |
| 2026-08-23 | 64% |
| 2026-08-22 | 64% |
| 2026-08-21 | 64% |
| 2026-08-20 | 64% |
| 2026-08-19 | 64% |
| 2026-08-18 | 64% |
| 2026-08-17 | 64% |
| 2026-08-16 | 64% |
| 2026-08-15 | 64% |
| 2026-08-14 | 64% |
| 2026-08-13 | 64% |
| 2026-08-12 | 64% |
| 2026-08-11 | 64% |
| 2026-08-10 | 64% |
| 2026-08-09 | 64% |
| 2026-08-08 | 64% |
| 2026-08-07 | 64% |
| 2026-08-06 | 64% |
| 2026-08-05 | 64% |
| 2026-08-04 | 64% |
| 2026-08-03 | 64% |
| 2026-08-02 | 64% |
| 2026-08-01 | 64% |
| 2026-07-31 | 64% |
| 2026-07-30 | 64% |
| 2026-07-29 | 64% |
| 2026-07-28 | 64% |
| 2026-07-27 | 64% |
| 2026-07-26 | 64% |
| 2026-07-25 | 64% |
| 2026-07-24 | 64% |
| 2026-07-23 | 64% |
| 2026-07-22 | 64% |
| 2026-07-21 | 64% |
| 2026-07-20 | 64% |
| 2026-07-19 | 64% |
| 2026-07-18 | 64% |
This Meme coin has an estimated scam risk of about 54% (grade C). The main risk signals include Mintable, Liquidity (LP) not locked, Ownership not renounced. 4 positive signals were also found. This is an uncalibrated estimate and not investment advice.
How this score was produced
- Risk signals combined (diminishing returns): 54% (overlapping signals add less and less)
- = Final 54% (the larger of the two, capped at 100% · weights are set by the operator and tested on past cases before any change)
Risk signals (probability contribution)
The operator can mint additional tokens, inflating the supply without limit and diluting the value you hold.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
Owner powers are still active, so the owner-only functions listed above can actually be exercised.
In projects that keep distributing rewards or airdrops, this is a common design. Even so, the fact that the privilege exists is unchanged, and the risk does not disappear.
The liquidity (LP) is not locked, so the operator can pull the liquidity in a rug pull.
Liquidity is very low, so even a small sell swings the price sharply and exiting is difficult.
Positive signals (Green Flags)
These are observed facts, not approvals — appearing on a listing or data service means a profile exists there, not that anyone vetted the project.
A static check found no sell-blocking configuration. This reflects a code/configuration check, not an actual trade run — cross-checking via a real sell simulation is shown separately as the 'second-source cross-check' item.
There is no function to arbitrarily block specific wallets from trading.
No single wallet monopolizes the supply, so the risk of a single dump is small.
However, this metric looks only at the single largest wallet — one party splitting holdings across several wallets lowers each share and can look distributed.
A profile for this token exists on major coin-data services. Being listed is not being vetted and is not evidence of safety — it does not mean anyone reviewed or approved the project, and widely listed coins have collapsed before.
Web reputation & whitepaper check (optional · about 10s)
The score above is based on on-chain indicators. This button searches the public web now for scam allegations and whitepaper content (no re-run of the on-chain check). Web search is paid and slow, so we do not run it automatically on every token — only manually when needed. Once run, the result is saved and shown automatically from then on. Web allegations are not conclusions, so verify them directly.
Project info (dev & social)
GitHub not found · X · Homepage
Categories: BNB Chain Ecosystem, Solana Ecosystem, Meme, Wormhole Assets, Dog-Themed
Profile as of 2026-08-21 — the dev/social figures above were observed at that time and may differ now. (Stale figures are not used in the risk verdict.)
Liquidity & volume (for rug-risk judgment · not a price/value assessment)
Main pair (deepest pool) liquidity $1,765 (raydium) · the totals combine every pair on this chain · View pool ↗
Note the two different bases: the risk score and signals are computed from the main pair alone, while the figures above are the sum of all pairs. A low main-pair pool can therefore raise a "very low liquidity" signal even when the combined total looks large.
Community rating (for reference · not in the score)
This estimate is as of the assessment time — a token's state can change at any moment · Method · Grade criteria